Listen to this post

On October 18, 2023, the EPA published a Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“SNPR”) regarding incidental discharges from vessels, proposing national performance standards under the Vessel Incidental Discharge Act (“VIDA”). The VIDA, enacted in December 2018, will standardize incidental discharge permits and regulations, replacing the 2013 Vessel General Permit (“VGP”) that commercial vessels are currently required to follow. The SNPR presents new data on ballast water management systems and solicits public comments on the standards and definitions applicable to ballast tanks, hulls and associated niche areas, and graywater systems. The SNPR responds to comments to the EPA’s proposed VIDA standards in its initial Notice of Proposed Rulemaking from three years ago, bringing VIDA one step closer to full implementation.

The VIDA tasks the EPA with developing national standards of performance for discharges incidental to the normal operation of primarily commercial vessels that are over seventy-nine feet in length. It also requires the U.S. Coast Guard (“USCG”) to develop corresponding regulations to enforce compliance with the EPA’s standards. On October 26, 2020, the EPA proposed a set of discharge standards for twenty different types of incidental discharges from vessel equipment and systems. These standards aim to minimize the discharge of pollutants such as aquatic nuisance species, bacteria or pathogens, and oil and grease into the waters of the United States and the contiguous zone.

Although the deadline for doing so was December 4, 2020, these standards have not yet been finalized or implemented. When the deadline passed, environmental groups sued the EPA alleging that the EPA’s delay violated the Clean Water Act. In September 2023, the parties entered into a Consent Decree that requires the EPA to take final action by September 23, 2024. The USCG will then have two years to develop and finalize corresponding regulations. The EPA is currently soliciting comments on the SNPR’s proposals concerning ballast tanks, hulls and associated niche areas, and graywater systems, as follows:

Ballast Tanks: Most of the SNPR is devoted to ballast water and its associated standards and plans for vessels and their equipment. The proposed standards are similar to the current VGP requirements with certain notable differences.

  • The SNPR first solicits comments on the EPA’s decision not to propose stricter ballast water discharge standards than those promulgated by the International Maritime Organization and the USCG. The SNPR presents new data gathered by the USCG and the EPA’s analysis of that data, concluding that a “no detectable organisms” standard is unworkable. The SNPR also concludes that under the EPA’s analysis, a stricter ballast water discharge standard would not be the “Best Available Technology Economically Achievable,” or “BAT.”
  • Next, the SNPR proposes requiring vessel operators to identify best management practices, or “BMPs,” as part of their ballast water management plans. While the EPA’s 2020 proposed regulations had removed this requirement, it is already a requirement in the VGP and the USCG regulations. The SNPR explains that the “EPA does not expect that this option would result in a change to the compliance costs estimated in the Regulatory Impact Analysis accompanying the proposed rule.”
  • The SNPR also proposes new equipment standards for “Lakers,” which are vessels that operate exclusively on the Great Lakes. The VGP requires Lakers built after January 1, 2009, or “New Lakers,” to meet its numeric ballast water discharge standard. In the EPA’s 2020 proposed regulations, Lakers are subcategorized and completely exempted from the VGP’s numeric standard but required to implement certain BMPs. In response to comments received, the SNPR proposes that all Lakers be subject to an equipment standard rather than a numeric discharge standard. The SNPR clarifies the definition of “New Laker” and proposes that New Lakers install and operate USCG-approved ballast water management systems.

Hulls and Associated Niche Areas: The SNPR proposes a more standardized approach to biofouling, which it describes as “the accumulation of aquatic organisms such as microorganisms, plants, and animals on surfaces and structures in or exposed to the aquatic environment.” The EPA predicts that the SNPR’s proposed options will not significantly change existing compliance costs. Currently, the VGP addresses some seawater piping biofouling chemicals, and it includes certain state-specific biofouling requirements.

  • The SNPR defines new terms related to biofouling, including “passive discharge of biofouling,” “active discharge of biofouling,” “anti-fouling coating,” “anti-fouling system,” “microfouling,” and “macrofouling,” and eliminates vague terms such as “frequent,” “gentle,” “minimal,” “local in origin,” and “plume or cloud of paint.”
  • In particular, the SNPR distinguishes between the “passive” and “active” discharge of biofouling, stating that “[p]assive discharge of biofouling means the discharge of biofouling from a vessel (for example, sloughing) during a period in which the vessel is not undergoing active cleaning activities.” The VGP draws no distinction between the two, so the SNPR seeks to clarify that passive discharge is also within VIDA’s ambit.
  • The 2020 proposed regulations did not detail the differences between in-water cleaning without capture and in-water cleaning with capture. Based on feedback the EPA received, the SNPR proposes: “(a) prohibiting any discharge from in-water cleaning of macrofouling without capture; and (b) establishing discharge requirements for in-water cleaning of microfouling of vessel hulls and associated niche areas.”
  • The SNPR also proposes different procedures for managing hulls and associated niche areas to minimize macrofouling, which is “biofouling caused by the attachment and subsequent growth of visible plants and animals on structures and vessels immersed in or exposed to water.”

Graywater Systems: In the 2020 proposed regulations, the EPA suggested that all vessels over 400 GT be subject to the VGP’s graywater numeric discharge standard. In response to comments received, the SNPR proposes exempting vessels that have a maximum overnight capacity of fewer than fifteen persons because these vessels generate less graywater. Graywater is defined as “water drained or collected from showers, baths, sinks, and laundry facilities.”

  • The proposed standards largely mirror the current discharge limits in the USCG regulations and the VGP. However, the VIDA standards will be more consistent than the individual state requirements found in the VGP for certain discharges.

Comments on the SNPR are due by December 18, 2023. The full text of the SNPR can be found here: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-10-18/pdf/2023-22879.pdf.

If you have further questions regarding this topic, contact Liskow attorneys Nicolette Kraska, Emily von Qualen, or Clare Bienvenu.

Disclaimer: This Blog/Web Site is made available by the law firm of Liskow & Lewis, APLC (“Liskow & Lewis”) and the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site for educational purposes and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law only, not to provide specific legal advice as to an identified problem or issue. By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney-client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter.

Privacy Policy: By subscribing to Liskow & Lewis’ E-Communications, you will receive articles and blogs with insight and analysis of legal issues that may impact your industry. Communications include firm news, insights, and events. To receive information from Liskow & Lewis, your information will be kept in a secured contact database. If at any time you would like to unsubscribe, please use the SafeUnsubscribe® link located at the bottom of every email that you receive.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Nicolette Kraska Nicolette Kraska

Nicolette is an associate in the firm’s Maritime, Oilfield, and Insurance practice group based in New Orleans. Her practice covers litigation, contract drafting, and commercial disputes. Nicolette also maintains an active pro bono practice.

Prior to joining the firm, Nicolette served as a

Nicolette is an associate in the firm’s Maritime, Oilfield, and Insurance practice group based in New Orleans. Her practice covers litigation, contract drafting, and commercial disputes. Nicolette also maintains an active pro bono practice.

Prior to joining the firm, Nicolette served as a law clerk to the Honorable Eldon E. Fallon of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana and the Honorable Jacques L. Wiener of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Before law school, Nicolette was an economic and damages consultant for Kroll, LLC (formerly Duff & Phelps), providing expert witness services to high-profile clients involved in intellectual property litigation and licensing.

Nicolette received her Juris Doctor from Tulane University School of Law, where she earned the Admiralty and Maritime Law Certificate. Nicolette served as the Senior Articles Editor of the Tulane Law Review, President of the Tulane Maritime Law Society, and Student Attorney in the Civil Rights and Federal Practice Clinic and the Tulane University Legal Assistance Program.

Nicolette hails from the Midwest and grew up boating on Barkley and Kentucky Lakes and the Mississippi and Illinois Rivers. Nicolette earned her boating license at a young age and helped her family crew maintain small and large powerboats. In recent years, Nicolette has spent time on powerboats around Florida’s Gulf Coast.

Photo of Emily von Qualen Emily von Qualen

Emily is an environmental litigator practicing in the firm’s New Orleans office.

Prior to joining the firm, Emily practiced complex business law in the litigation group at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP in Houston.  Immediately after law school, she clerked in…

Emily is an environmental litigator practicing in the firm’s New Orleans office.

Prior to joining the firm, Emily practiced complex business law in the litigation group at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP in Houston.  Immediately after law school, she clerked in the Western District of Louisiana with Judge Minaldi.

Emily received her Juris Doctor from Tulane University Law School in 2016, graduating first in her class.  During law school, she also served as a judicial extern to the Honorable James L. Dennis of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the Honorable James Brady of the United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana.

Photo of Clare M. Bienvenu Clare M. Bienvenu

Clare Bienvenu is an environmental regulatory and litigation lawyer who has practiced in both Louisiana and California, working with clients across the United States. Clare counsels clients regarding complex environmental regulatory, enforcement, and permitting issues spanning the range of federal and state environmental…

Clare Bienvenu is an environmental regulatory and litigation lawyer who has practiced in both Louisiana and California, working with clients across the United States. Clare counsels clients regarding complex environmental regulatory, enforcement, and permitting issues spanning the range of federal and state environmental laws. Clare additionally facilitates the permitting and regulatory aspects of developing new facilities on behalf of energy, petrochemical, and industrial clients. Her substantive environmental experience includes air permitting, hazardous waste regulation, land remediation, land use regulation, coastal regulation, carbon sequestration projects, and renewable energy projects.

Clare has played a key role in various administrative matters, proceedings, and enforcement actions. She has participated in consent decree negotiations and the termination of consent decrees with the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Justice, as well as settlement negotiations with the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality and the California Air Resources Board. Clare has also represented clients in permitting matters involving the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management. She also advises on environmental justice considerations in the context of agency permitting.