By Leta Seletzky:

In Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. Railroad Comm’n, No. 03-0364, 2007 WL 1299163 (Tex. May 4, 2007), the Texas Supreme Court affirmed a decision by the Austin Court of Appeals upholding the Railroad Commission of Texas’ authority to regulate both drilling and production of commingled oil and/or gas deposits

By Dana M. Douglas

On April 20, 2007, the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (“DNR”) issued regulations establishing procedures for agency hearings and the submission and approval of remediation plans under Act 312 of 2006.  Act 312, which enacted La. R.S. 30:29, made sweeping changes to the procedures for litigation involving potential environmental damage

As previously reported, the trial court in M. J . Farms v. ExxonMobil held Act 312 of 2006, governing remediation of oilfield sites, to be unconstitutional.  The Louisiana Supreme Court has now held that the plaintiff did not properly raise the issue of constitutionality at the trial court level, and remanded to allow the plaintiff

In 2002, Jupiter Energy Corporation ("Jupiter") applied to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") for a determination that two of its pipelines in the Gulf of Mexico were not for the primary purpose of transporting gas — a purpose within the FERC’s regulatory jurisdiction — but were instead for the primary purpose of gathering gas

At its April 11 lease sale, the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources will offer four offshore tracts, one in the Grand Isle area and three in the Main Pass area.  The Department will also offer 17 tracts in waters that the state designates as inland.  Six tracts are in the Chandeluer Sound area, two will cover portions of